public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fix PR 33870
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473AE434.3060404@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000711140317o5abefc88n1c01e562d46baed0@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther wrote:

> Oh, and as you basically go back towards my first fix that was reverted this
> patch causes compile-time regressions and we hit
> internal compiler error: in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:484
> more often as well.

You'll need to be more specific.  We are simply limiting the first SFT 
of a nested struct out of the partitioner, instead of recursing into MPT 
elements during operand scanning.

Where is the extra compile time coming from?  Are we generating that 
many more virtual operands?  It would help quite a bit if you'd open a 
PR with a testcase for me to reproduce this behaviour.


Thanks.  Diego.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-08  0:24 Diego Novillo
2007-11-08  0:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-11-08  2:20   ` Diego Novillo
2007-11-08 10:45 ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-13 16:30   ` Diego Novillo
2007-11-13 16:47     ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 12:36       ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 12:41         ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 13:01           ` Diego Novillo [this message]
2007-11-14 13:18             ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 13:59               ` Diego Novillo
2007-11-14 14:07                 ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 14:09                   ` Diego Novillo
2007-11-14 14:22                     ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 15:29                       ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-14 15:30                         ` Diego Novillo
2007-11-15 13:55                           ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-15 15:47                             ` Richard Guenther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473AE434.3060404@google.com \
    --to=dnovillo@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).