From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12435 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2007 15:49:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 12426 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2007 15:49:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from posta.ti-edu.ch (HELO ti-edu.ch) (195.176.176.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:49:08 +0000 Received: from mail.lu.unisi.ch ([195.176.178.40] verified) by ti-edu.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 23098900 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:49:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.65.177] ([195.176.178.3] RDNS failed) by mail.lu.unisi.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:49:05 +0100 Message-ID: <47445361.1080800@lu.unisi.ch> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:28:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini Reply-To: bonzini@gnu.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernhard Fischer , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR33396 - add --enable-intermodule for libgcc References: <20071119175146.GA1588@aon.at> <474293D9.3090006@gnu.org> <20071121153910.GA2187@aon.at> In-Reply-To: <20071121153910.GA2187@aon.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg01110.txt.bz2 >> I am not sure what happens if you pass combine for many assembly source >> codes, as in this: > > I only checked on i386 (which doesn't seem to have any LIB1ASMFUNCS), > but i guess it should work fine. You can try it on the command line, using -### to see what is passed actually to gas and ld. > Looks like it would be the least intrusive approach to add > libgcc/*-obj*-onestep.mk that mimmic the normal *-obj*.mk > Alternatively i'd have to add 'ifneq ($(onestep),)' to the iterator *.mk. > What do you think? I suggest you try both on one iterator makefile, and see what looks nicer. Thanks! Paolo