From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 77183 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2015 19:08:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 77169 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2015 19:08:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:08:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C918328540D5; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:08:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chhqeHR1AaOY; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:08:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1CCE28540CA; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:08:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Ramana Radhakrishnan Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] scalar-storage-order merge: C front-end Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4754727.t6iTjN5Pzj@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.10-1.29-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <557FE6FA.9020803@foss.arm.com> References: <3247494.5bgQPARZRk@polaris> <2396877.AqT21tpnmO@polaris> <557FE6FA.9020803@foss.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01302.txt.bz2 > A very cursory glance at the patch set but should we restrict this > attribute to apply only to scalar types rather than allow them on vector > extensions. I haven't had enough coffee this morning but a first > thought is that if it does apply on vector type extensions, clarifying > the lane ordering up front would be helpful especially as we now allow > indexing into short vectors. That's reasonable, and the name would sort of imply it, although the current implementation doesn't do that (but wasn't really tested with vector types). -- Eric Botcazou