From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23709 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2007 03:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 23694 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2007 03:31:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:30:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 13084 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2007 03:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 12 Dec 2007 03:30:54 -0000 Message-ID: <475F55E4.1090203@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:22:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?Big5?B?IkRvdWcgS3dhbiAow/autrx3KSI=?= CC: Kenneth Zadeck , Andrew Pinski , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Diego Novillo , Nathan Froyd Subject: Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem References: <498552560712042305h6aa6f4d8jfdc8e9031b522604@mail.gmail.com> <47569FA0.5040308@naturalbridge.com> <4756D2FB.6020703@codesourcery.com> <498552560712051100s283acdc3le82c21759d7c3b6f@mail.gmail.com> <475739AD.5050705@codesourcery.com> <498552560712111504y77964103i3a0ad3743b77a5c9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <498552560712111504y77964103i3a0ad3743b77a5c9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 Doug Kwan (Ãö®¶¼w) wrote: > There is another wrinkle. The complex extended float type has the same > issue. I don't really think it is correct to use DW_AT_bit_size & > DW_AT_bit_offset for this case since the bits are not contiguous. > However, in the name of not complicating things, I prefer using > existing DW_AT_bit_size and DW_AT_bit_offset than adding a new GNU > extension. I am fine either way. What do you guys think? What do you mean about the bits not being contiguous? Can you explain that a little bit? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713