From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30327 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2008 14:21:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 30318 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2008 14:21:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:20:54 +0000 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m2EEKq1d003673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:20:52 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nfde27.prod.google.com [10.48.131.27]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m2EEKoCu018299 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:20:51 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so1585333nfd.13 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.165.16 with SMTP id n16mr30402051hue.59.1205504448668; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-172-19-57-187.corp.google.com ( [172.19.57.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm8575682hue.17.2008.03.14.07.20.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47DA89BD.2050004@google.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:21:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Guenther CC: Oleg Ryjkov , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [tuples][patch] Removing gimplify_val References: <14be89990803131659i6f5e18c6hcdb62d81f2f7190d@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803140237k278dacbai407677c4c0cae575@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000803140237k278dacbai407677c4c0cae575@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2 On 3/14/08 2:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > Can you do so on the trunk as well? The only difference I see with > the two functions is that gimplify_val sets location information on > the new stmt - you may want to do some digging in the archives > for what reason this went in and eventually update force_gimple_operand_bsi > to do so as well. Good idea. Oleg, please submit this patch for mainline. Make force_gimple_operand_gsi set the location of all the statements in STMTS in the loop that scans for symbols to rename. Diego.