From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix excess precision related ICE on invalid binop [PR107382, PR107383]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:56:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47a3cbeb-60ce-534b-305c-ddf4036bef2f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1juZu+TsIub4jZj@tucnak>
On 10/26/22 04:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following tests ICE in the gcc_assert (common); in cp_build_binary_op.
> I've missed that while for * common is set always, while for +, - and /
> it is in some cases not.
> If it is not, then
> if (!result_type
> && arithmetic_types_p
> && (shorten || common || short_compare))
> condition is false, then the following
> if (may_need_excess_precision
> && (orig_type0 != type0 || orig_type1 != type1)
> && build_type == NULL_TREE)
> would fail the assertion there and if there wouldn't be excess precision,
> if (code == SPACESHIP_EXPR)
> would be false (for SPACESHIP_EXPR we always have build_type set like for
> other comparisons) and then trigger
> if (!result_type)
> {
> if (complain & tf_error)
> {
> binary_op_rich_location richloc (location,
> orig_op0, orig_op1, true);
> error_at (&richloc,
> "invalid operands of types %qT and %qT to binary %qO",
> TREE_TYPE (orig_op0), TREE_TYPE (orig_op1), code);
> }
> return error_mark_node;
> }
> So, if result_type is NULL, we don't really need to compute
> semantic_result_type because nothing will use it anyway and can get
> fall through into the error/return error_mark_node; case.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
> 2022-10-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/107382
> PR c++/107383
> * typeck.cc (cp_build_binary_op): Don't compute semantic_result_type
> if result_type is NULL.
>
> * g++.dg/diagnostic/bad-binary-ops2.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/typeck.cc.jj 2022-10-25 10:37:28.008533040 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/typeck.cc 2022-10-25 19:18:20.951846806 +0200
> @@ -6179,7 +6179,8 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
> }
> if (may_need_excess_precision
> && (orig_type0 != type0 || orig_type1 != type1)
> - && build_type == NULL_TREE)
> + && build_type == NULL_TREE
> + && result_type)
> {
> gcc_assert (common);
> semantic_result_type = cp_common_type (orig_type0, orig_type1);
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/bad-binary-ops2.C.jj 2022-10-25 19:49:49.190198057 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/bad-binary-ops2.C 2022-10-25 20:10:35.266264891 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// PR c++/107382
> +// PR c++/107383
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +// { dg-options "-O2 -fexcess-precision=standard" }
> +
> +void
> +foo ()
> +{
> + float t[2] = { 1, 2 };
> + int const *s = 0;
> + t[1] / s; // { dg-error "invalid operands of types 'float' and 'const int\\\*' to binary 'operator/'" }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar ()
> +{
> + float t[2] = { 1, 2 };
> + int const *s[2] = { 0, 0 };
> + t[1] / s[0]; // { dg-error "invalid operands of types 'float' and 'const int\\\*' to binary 'operator/'" }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +baz (float a, int* b)
> +{
> + a -= b; // { dg-error "invalid operands of types 'float' and 'int\\\*' to binary 'operator-'" }
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-26 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 8:23 Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-26 16:56 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47a3cbeb-60ce-534b-305c-ddf4036bef2f@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).