From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23725 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2008 13:02:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 23707 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2008 13:02:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kirk.baltic.net (HELO kirk.baltic.net) (193.189.247.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:01:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 5189 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2008 13:01:35 -0000 Received: from mail.rst-rostock.de (HELO [192.168.60.88]) (82.193.240.2) by kirk.baltic.net (GECKO-MTA/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:01:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4864E448.2080204@gecko.de> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:02:00 -0000 From: Gunther Nikl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15) Gecko/20080621 SeaMonkey/1.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: Gunnar Von Boehn , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Fix for GCC Bugzilla Bug 36133 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg01738.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Gunnar Von Boehn" writes: > >> AFAIK GCC 2.9 did behave correctly in this matter. > > I don't know what gcc 2.9 refers to, but the handling of lshiftr in That quite likely refers to GCC 2.95.x > notice_update_cc was changed 5 years ago, presumably because of a > wrong-code bug (I cannot find any reference in the gcc-patches archive). The following link should be the thread about that change you were looking for: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg01236.html Gunther