From: Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/37647: ICE with invalid use of constructor
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49022260.8070307@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F26C19.6080803@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 850 bytes --]
Hi Mark,
>> The problem is that DECL_CONSTRUCTOR is set for "void A();", which
>> implies that we call 'grok_ctor_properties' itself calling 'copy_fn_p',
>> that asserts that the passed declaration "has" DECL_FUNCTION_MEMBER_P,
>> which is obviously not the case here.
>
> Is there any way that we can avoid even getting the idea that this is an
> sfk_constructor? Your patch seems like it's a bit later than we'd like;
> we're concluding that the function is sfk_constructor and then backing
> out when we notice that ctype is NULL. Can we just avoid concluding
> this is a constructor at all?
The attached patch does the check earlier and reports an error when
encountering a constructor or a destructor in a non-class scope.
I've successfully tested it on x86_64-apple-darwin-9. Is it better?
OK for 4.3 and for the mainline?
Thanks,
Simon
[-- Attachment #2: CL_37647 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
2008-10-24 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/37647
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Reject [con|de]stuctors in a non-class
scope.
[-- Attachment #3: pr37647_2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 651 bytes --]
Index: gcc/cp/decl.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 141326)
+++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy)
@@ -9252,6 +9252,14 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec
error ("virtual non-class function %qs", name);
virtualp = 0;
}
+ else if (sfk == sfk_constructor
+ || sfk == sfk_destructor)
+ {
+ error (funcdef_flag
+ ? "%qs defined in a non-class scope"
+ : "%qs declared in a non-class scope", name);
+ sfk = sfk_none;
+ }
}
else if (TREE_CODE (type) == FUNCTION_TYPE && staticp < 2
&& !NEW_DELETE_OPNAME_P (original_name))
[-- Attachment #4: CL_37647_testsuite --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 112 bytes --]
2008-10-24 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/37647
* g++.dg/parse/ctor9.C: New test.
[-- Attachment #5: ctor9.C --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]
/* PR c++/37647 */
/* { dg-do "compile" } */
struct A
{
A() { void A(); } /* { dg-error "return type specification for constructor invalid|non-class scope" } */
};
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 4:46 Simon Martin
2008-10-13 3:24 ` Mark Mitchell
2008-10-24 21:42 ` Simon Martin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49022260.8070307@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=simartin@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).