public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luoxhu <luoxhu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com,
	wschmidt@linux.ibm.com, guojiufu@linux.ibm.com,
	linkw@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Define movsf_from_si2 to extract high part SF element from DImode[PR89310]
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:30:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49363e95-d454-d9af-24aa-45f641da29fa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200711005438.GE30544@gate.crashing.org>

Hi,

On 2020/7/11 08:54, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:39:40AM +0800, luoxhu wrote:
>> OK, seems the md file needs a format tool too...
> 
> Heh.  Just make sure it looks good (that is, does what it looks like),
> looks like the rest, etc.  It's hard to do anything nice with unspecs,
> [ ] lists do not format well.
> 
>>>> +  "TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG"
>>>> +  "#"
>>>> +  "&& vsx_reg_sfsubreg_ok (operands[0], SFmode)"
>>>
>>> Put this in the insn condition?  And since this is just a predicate,
>>> you can just use it instead of gpc_reg_operand.
>>>
>>> (The split condition becomes "&& 1" then, not "").
>>
>> OK, this seems a bit strange as movsi_from_sf, movsf_from_si and
>> movdi_from_sf_zero_ext all use it as condition...
> 
> Since in your case you *always* split, the split condition should be
> "always".  There are no alternatives that do not split here.
> 
>> And why vsx_reg_sfsubreg_ok allows "SF SUBREGS" and TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG
>> "avoid (SUBREG:SF (REG:SI)", I guess they are not the same meaning? (The
>> TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG is also copied from other similar defines.)  Thanks.
> 
> Good question.  I do not know.
> 
> Well...  Since this define_insn* requires p8 *anyway*, we do not need
> any of these sf_subreg things?  We always know for each one if it should
> be true or false.

Yes, removed the vsx_reg_sfsubreg_ok check.

> 
>> +  "TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG"
> 
> But here we should require p8 some other way, then.

TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG is defined to TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE_64BIT, and
TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE_64BIT is TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE && TARGET_P8_VECTOR && TARGET_POWERPC64
which means TARGET_P8_VECTOR must be true for TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG.

> 
>> +  (set_attr "isa" "p8v")])
> 
> (This isn't enough, unfortunately).
> 


Updated patch to removed the vsx_reg_sfsubreg_ok and ICE fix:


For extracting high part element from DImode register like:

{%1:SF=unspec[r122:DI>>0x20#0] 86;clobber scratch;}

split it before reload with "and mask" to avoid generating shift right
32 bit then shift left 32 bit.  This pattern also exists in PR42475 and
PR67741, etc.

srdi 3,3,32
sldi 9,3,32
mtvsrd 1,9
xscvspdpn 1,1

=>

rldicr 3,3,0,31
mtvsrd 1,3
xscvspdpn 1,1

Bootstrap and regression tested pass on Power8-LE.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2020-07-13  Xionghu Luo  <luoxhu@linux.ibm.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/89310
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (movsf_from_si2): New
	define_insn_and_split.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-07-13  Xionghu Luo  <luoxhu@linux.ibm.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/89310
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md                | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c | 17 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 4fcd6a94022..480385ed4d2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -7593,6 +7593,37 @@ (define_insn_and_split "movsf_from_si"
 	    "*,          *,         p9v,       p8v,       *,         *,
 	     p8v,        p8v,       p8v,       *")])
 
+;; For extracting high part element from DImode register like:
+;;     {%1:SF=unspec[r122:DI>>0x20#0] 86;clobber scratch;}
+;; split it before reload with "and mask" to avoid generating shift right
+;; 32 bit then shift left 32 bit.
+(define_insn_and_split "movsf_from_si2"
+  [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=wa")
+	    (unspec:SF
+	     [(subreg:SI
+	       (ashiftrt:DI
+		(match_operand:DI 1 "input_operand" "r")
+		(const_int 32))
+	       0)]
+	     UNSPEC_SF_FROM_SI))
+  (clobber (match_scratch:DI 2 "=r"))]
+  "TARGET_NO_SF_SUBREG"
+  "#"
+  "&& 1"
+  [(const_int 0)]
+{
+  if (GET_CODE (operands[2]) == SCRATCH)
+    operands[2] = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
+
+  rtx mask = GEN_INT (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << 32);
+  emit_insn (gen_anddi3 (operands[2], operands[1], mask));
+  emit_insn (gen_p8_mtvsrd_sf (operands[0], operands[2]));
+  emit_insn (gen_vsx_xscvspdpn_directmove (operands[0], operands[0]));
+  DONE;
+}
+  [(set_attr "length" "12")
+  (set_attr "type" "vecfloat")
+  (set_attr "isa" "p8v")])
 
 ;; Move 64-bit binary/decimal floating point
 (define_expand "mov<mode>"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..15e78509246
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr89310.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+struct s {
+  int i;
+  float f;
+};
+
+float
+foo (struct s arg)
+{
+  return arg.f;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\msrdi\M} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\msldi\M} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldicr\M} 1 } } */
-- 
2.21.0.777.g83232e3864



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-13  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-06  2:17 [PATCH] rs6000: Split movsf_from_si from high word before reload[PR89310] Xionghu Luo
2020-07-07  0:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-07  8:39   ` luoxhu
2020-07-07 21:31     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-08  3:19       ` luoxhu
2020-07-08 22:43         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-09  3:09           ` luoxhu
2020-07-09 19:25             ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-10  1:39               ` [PATCH] rs6000: Define movsf_from_si2 to extract high part SF element from DImode[PR89310] luoxhu
2020-07-11  0:54                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-13  6:30                   ` luoxhu [this message]
2020-07-14 14:17                     ` David Edelsohn
2020-07-15  3:47                       ` luoxhu
2020-07-20 15:31                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-21  3:43                       ` luoxhu
2020-07-10  7:41               ` [PATCH] rs6000: Split movsf_from_si from high word before reload[PR89310] luoxhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49363e95-d454-d9af-24aa-45f641da29fa@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=luoxhu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).