From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-239476-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30054 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 06:57:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 30044 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2009 06:57:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:57:01 +0000
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so553369fge.5         for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.86.82.6 with SMTP id f6mr2939370fgb.79.1240815418376;         Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 93-103-18-160.static.t-2.net (93-103-18-160.static.t-2.net [93.103.18.160])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm516904fgb.12.2009.04.26.23.56.57         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49F55738.4020102@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:16:00 -0000
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR target/39903: [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE on flexible  member
References: <20090426214652.GA19335@lucon.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090426214652.GA19335@lucon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02086.txt.bz2

H.J. Lu wrote:

> construct_container isn't prepared to deal with
>
> struct X {
>   double d;
>   double b[];
> };
>
> This patch fixes it.  I am testing it on Linux/Intel64. OK for
> trunk and 4.4 if there are no regressions?
>   
OK for mainline.

Thanks,
Uros.