From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dnovillo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2E9C1D.7030209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609163111.GA21107@codesourcery.com>
> OK, how about this slightly more aggressive patch, which:
>
> - Moves packed_flag and user_align into tree_base;
I won't complain but, at some point, I'd rather see the flags in
tree_base called base_flag_{0,...} if we decide to go this way...
(or base_had_some_spare_bits_lets_use_them_for_flag_0). :-)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 15:32 Nathan Froyd
2009-06-08 17:11 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-08 18:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-08 20:28 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-08 20:32 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-09 6:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-09 14:54 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-09 15:00 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 15:07 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 15:44 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-10 2:50 ` Eric Botcazou
2009-06-09 15:40 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-09 15:53 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 16:31 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-09 16:34 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 16:36 ` Diego Novillo
2009-06-09 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-07-28 19:01 ` [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes (Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field) Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-28 19:40 ` Richard Guenther
2010-07-29 12:29 ` [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes (Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-28 22:07 ` [PATCH] [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-30 16:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-30 16:22 ` Richard Guenther
2010-07-30 16:22 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-31 17:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-07-31 19:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 14:03 ` Paul Brook
2010-08-04 14:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 14:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 15:04 ` Paul Brook
2010-08-04 16:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 15:33 ` Martin Sebor
2010-08-04 15:47 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-05 9:02 ` Martin Sebor
2009-06-08 19:40 ` [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-08 19:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-08 20:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-06-08 20:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-06-08 20:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2E9C1D.7030209@gmail.com \
--to=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).