From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21128 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2009 10:50:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 21104 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2009 10:50:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (HELO vsmtp4.tin.it) (212.216.176.224) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:50:15 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (79.43.214.116) by vsmtp4.tin.it (8.5.113) id 4AB26CCC05D73AD2; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:50:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4B1F80DF.5020402@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:58:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 SUSE/3.0b4-3.6 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Klose CC: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , Richard Earnshaw , Andrew Haley , Jakub Jelinek , Alexandre Oliva , Nathan Froyd , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches Subject: Re: [ping2] Re: [ping] Re: [patch] PR40134, use a linker script on arm-linux to link with -lgcc_s -lgcc References: <4A530F5C.4040500@ubuntu.com> <20090707091425.GB4462@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4A5B32BB.5010308@ubuntu.com> <20090909112436.GV14664@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4AAA8510.8060906@ubuntu.com> <4AB8C07D.3010807@ubuntu.com> <4AB8F3C2.60909@redhat.com> <4ABB2CB3.8090800@ubuntu.com> <4ABB30DE.6050502@redhat.com> <4ABB3BE6.4060800@ubuntu.com> <4ABB4C9B.3070200@redhat.com> <1255527525.4842.29.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4ADF0B67.9070505@ubuntu.com> <4AEA2FF1.6060508@ubuntu.com> <4AEA3318.6060607@oracle.com> <4AEF025A.5060403@ubuntu.com> <4AEF08BF.4020500@oracle.com> <4AFC5187.2010909@ubuntu.com> <4AFC54A0.7080109@oracle.com> <4B1F7F16.8050708@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1F7F16.8050708@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 On 12/09/2009 11:42 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > would a patch acceptable to run these link tests on linux only? Sure. If you can cook up something (e.g, a version of the configure code I wrote at the time) running only where it's safe to run it (I think linux targets are all safe), fine with me! Paolo.