From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4970 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 4961 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2010 19:12:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:12:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0EJCfTu020862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:12:41 -0500 Received: from anchor.twiddle.home (vpn-232-166.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.232.166]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0EJCeI7012894; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:12:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4F6CA8.9060103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:12:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Richard Guenther , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20100114093345.GM16723@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100114093345.GM16723@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00674.txt.bz2 On 01/14/2010 01:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00430.html > - 4.5: fix VTA from needlessly resetting debug stmts during inlining > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00431.html > - 4.5: fix var-tracking on MO_USE_NO_VAR > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00403.html > - 4.5/4.4: don't emit .weak for undefs that are DECL_WEAK just > because the undef symbols are known to use C++ vague linkage. > Only emit .weak for undefs if they have weak attribute, #pragma weak > or some target specific similar extension. > > All patches have been bootstrapped/regtested several times on several linux > targets. All ok. r~