public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: IainS <developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch c++] (__attribute__((deprecated)), part a) Fix PR17729
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0EC931.6010106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8E1F6759-A426-494D-8B3B-58FDF04BFB1A@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>

On 04/17/2010 07:16 AM, IainS wrote:
> PR c++/17729
> * typeck.c(build_class_member_access_expr): Don't check for deprecation
> here.

I believe this will cause false negatives on template code.

> * call.c(build_call_a): Ditto.
> (build_over_call): Ditto.
> (convert_like_real): Check for deprecation here instead.
> (build_new_method_call): Ditto.

And these cause false negatives on overloaded functions.  We really need 
to handle functions in build_call_a and build_over_call, since that's 
when we know which function we're actually calling in the case of 
function overloading.  In the testcase, if you add a non-deprecated 
func(int), you get no warning about calling the deprecated func(void). 
The testcase also doesn't test member functions at all.

Sorry for the slow review; please feel free to ping me directly on C++ 
patches.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-17 12:47 IainS
2010-06-08 23:12 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2010-06-09  0:26   ` IainS
2010-06-09  3:29     ` Jason Merrill
2010-07-19 17:11       ` IainS
2010-07-19 17:59         ` Jason Merrill
2010-07-21 13:43           ` IainS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C0EC931.6010106@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).