From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16741 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2010 12:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16705 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2010 12:50:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f47.google.com) (74.125.82.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:50:43 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2035710wwb.20 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.68 with SMTP id f46mr514806wel.6.1276347040785; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l60sm815622wej.39.2010.06.12.05.50.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C13875C.2060202@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:11:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Guenther CC: GCC Patches , Kai Tietz Subject: Re: [4.5.1,PR42776] Backport LTO-COFF implementation. References: <4C12F96F.20108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01299.txt.bz2 On 12/06/2010 09:17, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Dave Korn wrote: >> Bootstrapped and tests running on i686-pc-cygwin; ok for branch if (when) no >> regressions? > > Ok. If you did the backport by applying the respective trunk revisions can > you after the commit diff the 4.5 variants of the new files to the trunk > variant to see if there are other fixes worth backporting? Yep, already did that; Kai's patch to add AMD64 machine support would also be worth bringing back. The only other changes on mainline are Joseph's recent tweaks to message-handling; not relevant. > Can you also post your testresults to gcc-testresults? Yep, won't commit until I've done so. (Running the full testsuite takes a couple of days on Cygwin.) On 12/06/2010 09:17, Richard Guenther wrote: > Oh, and add an entry to gcc-4.5/changes.html to the section for 4.5.1. Sure, will get to that after I check in the patch. cheers, DaveK