From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21367 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2010 18:33:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 21358 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2010 18:33:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:33:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5UIXLMM032007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:33:21 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5UIXKRc012996; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:33:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4C2B8DF0.8070800@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:08:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100619 Lightning/1.0b1 Shredder/3.0.6pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Froyd CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,c++] convert cp_parser.unparsed_function_queues &co. to VECs References: <20100607181435.GX19235@codesourcery.com> <4C0E6874.4040005@redhat.com> <20100608210337.GS19235@codesourcery.com> <20100616034331.GM27105@codesourcery.com> <4C18DC18.5010207@redhat.com> <20100616144808.GU27105@codesourcery.com> <20100628122739.GA22606@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20100628122739.GA22606@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg03179.txt.bz2 On 06/28/2010 08:27 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >> defarg8.C:8:23: error: 'i' was not declared in this scope > > Ping. Where does this patch stand? Should I: > > - Commit the original patch? > > - Hold off while you consider what might be wrong with your suggestion? > and/or > > - Debug your suggestion myself in hopes of figuring out what's wrong? The last, if you would. Is DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT not getting set for f? Jason