public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
To: FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
Cc: Tobias Burnus <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [libgomp,patch] Add omp_{integer,logical}_kind to omp_lib.h
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2DD4E2.7090000@net-b.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7B48F14A-3FF1-46A5-9295-3C1AA10168E7@gmail.com>

On 07/02/2010 12:27 PM, FX wrote:
> Anyone has access to the document? I cannot find anything on the IWOMP website, nor on openmp.org.
>   

The publication of the spec got delayed as the spec as not ready. There
was one meeting after the IWOMP conference to discuss further details,
but seemingly some more items need to be solved. Bronis de Supinski
wrote on 17 June that he hopes that the OpenMP 3.1 draft will be
available in few weeks. Cf. also Michael Wong's report at
http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/blogs/ccpp-parallel-multicore/2010/06/21/the-view-from-iwomp-2010-trip-report

If you spend 50 bucks/year, you can become cOMPunity member [1] and get
early access to the draft... (Which neither I nor Jakub have.)

For the features planed for 3.1, see the link above - and the relevant
proceedings in LNCS (linked from the conference site).
The OpenMP 3.1 goals were to refine and extend the existing
specification, not break existing code, and to pose a minimal
implementation burden beyond 3.0. Planed are:
- User-defined reduction operators [according to the proceeding paper,
it looks quite powerful and thus requires quite some work to implement -
thus one wonders about the definition of "minimal"]
- Atomics: support capture/write
- Task scheduling: taskyield construct, final clause

Tobias

[1] http://www.compunity.org/contacts/membership/index.php

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-02 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100611143040.GA18233@physik.fu-berlin.de>
2010-07-02 10:27 ` FX
2010-07-02 12:01   ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2010-06-10 21:48 FX
2010-06-10 22:24 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C2DD4E2.7090000@net-b.de \
    --to=burnus@net-b.de \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).