public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function
@ 2010-07-07  5:47 Jie Zhang
  2010-07-07 13:50 ` Paul Brook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jie Zhang @ 2010-07-07  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 385 bytes --]

ARM GCC will save r3 to the stack when it tries to align the stack to 
double-word. But it can only do so when r3 will not be saved. Otherwise 
there will be inconsistent information about how many registers will be 
saved and how much the stack will be adjusted. This patch fixes it.

Tested on arm-none-eabi. No regressions are found. Is it OK?


Regards,
-- 
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery

[-- Attachment #2: gcc-arm-fix-prologue-epilogue-with-interrupt.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2153 bytes --]


	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_get_frame_offsets): Don't use r3 to
	align the stack when it's going to be saved.

	testsuite/
	* gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c: New test.

Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* Verify that prologue and epilogue are correct for functions with
+   __attribute__ ((interrupt)).  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
+extern void bar (int);
+extern void foo (void) __attribute__ ((interrupt("IRQ")));
+
+void foo ()
+{
+  bar (0);
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, lr}" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, pc}\\^" } } */
Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* Verify that prologue and epilogue are correct for functions with
+   __attribute__ ((interrupt)).  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1" } */
+extern void bar (int);
+extern void test (void) __attribute__((__interrupt__));
+
+int foo;
+void test()
+{
+  funcptrs(foo);
+  foo = 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, lr}" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, pc}\\^" } } */
Index: config/arm/arm.c
===================================================================
--- config/arm/arm.c	(revision 161865)
+++ config/arm/arm.c	(working copy)
@@ -14690,7 +14690,8 @@ arm_get_frame_offsets (void)
 	     generates better code on Thumb-2 by avoiding the need to
 	     use 32-bit push/pop instructions.  */
 	  if (!crtl->tail_call_emit
-	      && arm_size_return_regs () <= 12)
+	      && arm_size_return_regs () <= 12
+	      && (offsets->saved_regs_mask & (1 << 3)) == 0)
 	    {
 	      reg = 3;
 	    }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function
  2010-07-07  5:47 [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function Jie Zhang
@ 2010-07-07 13:50 ` Paul Brook
  2010-07-12 13:41   ` Jie Zhang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Brook @ 2010-07-07 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Jie Zhang

> ARM GCC will save r3 to the stack when it tries to align the stack to
> double-word. But it can only do so when r3 will not be saved. Otherwise
> there will be inconsistent information about how many registers will be
> saved and how much the stack will be adjusted. This patch fixes it.
> 
> Tested on arm-none-eabi. No regressions are found. Is it OK?

Your test fails for Thumb multilibs.

Other than that, ok.

Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function
  2010-07-07 13:50 ` Paul Brook
@ 2010-07-12 13:41   ` Jie Zhang
  2010-07-12 14:06     ` Jie Zhang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jie Zhang @ 2010-07-12 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Brook; +Cc: gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 672 bytes --]

On 07/07/2010 09:49 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>> ARM GCC will save r3 to the stack when it tries to align the stack to
>> double-word. But it can only do so when r3 will not be saved. Otherwise
>> there will be inconsistent information about how many registers will be
>> saved and how much the stack will be adjusted. This patch fixes it.
>>
>> Tested on arm-none-eabi. No regressions are found. Is it OK?
>
> Your test fails for Thumb multilibs.
>
> Other than that, ok.
>
Here is the updated patch, with test cases updated. The method used in 
the tests to make them work with thumb is Paul's idea. I will commit on 
trunk and 4.5 branch soon.


-- 
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery

[-- Attachment #2: gcc-arm-fix-prologue-epilogue-with-interrupt-2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2615 bytes --]


	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_get_frame_offsets): Don't use r3 to
	align the stack when it's going to be saved.

	testsuite/
	* gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c: New test.

Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-1.c	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* Verify that prologue and epilogue are correct for functions with
+   __attribute__ ((interrupt)).  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
+
+/* This test is not valid when -mthumb.  We just cheat.  */
+#ifndef __thumb__
+extern void bar (int);
+extern void foo (void) __attribute__ ((interrupt("IRQ")));
+
+void foo ()
+{
+  bar (0);
+}
+#else
+void foo ()
+{
+  asm ("stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, lr}");
+  asm ("ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, pc}^");
+}
+#endif
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, lr}" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, fp, ip, pc}\\^" } } */
Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/interrupt-2.c	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/* Verify that prologue and epilogue are correct for functions with
+   __attribute__ ((interrupt)).  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1" } */
+
+/* This test is not valid when -mthum.  We just cheat.  */
+#ifndef __thumb__
+extern void bar (int);
+extern void test (void) __attribute__((__interrupt__));
+
+int foo;
+void test()
+{
+  funcptrs(foo);
+  foo = 0;
+}
+#else
+void test ()
+{
+  asm ("stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, lr}");
+  asm ("ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, pc}^");
+}
+#endif
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "stmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, lr}" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldmfd\tsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, pc}\\^" } } */
Index: config/arm/arm.c
===================================================================
--- config/arm/arm.c	(revision 162071)
+++ config/arm/arm.c	(working copy)
@@ -14691,7 +14691,8 @@ arm_get_frame_offsets (void)
 	     generates better code on Thumb-2 by avoiding the need to
 	     use 32-bit push/pop instructions.  */
 	  if (!crtl->tail_call_emit
-	      && arm_size_return_regs () <= 12)
+	      && arm_size_return_regs () <= 12
+	      && (offsets->saved_regs_mask & (1 << 3)) == 0)
 	    {
 	      reg = 3;
 	    }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function
  2010-07-12 13:41   ` Jie Zhang
@ 2010-07-12 14:06     ` Jie Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jie Zhang @ 2010-07-12 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Brook; +Cc: gcc-patches

On 07/12/2010 09:40 PM, Jie Zhang wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 09:49 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> ARM GCC will save r3 to the stack when it tries to align the stack to
>>> double-word. But it can only do so when r3 will not be saved. Otherwise
>>> there will be inconsistent information about how many registers will be
>>> saved and how much the stack will be adjusted. This patch fixes it.
>>>
>>> Tested on arm-none-eabi. No regressions are found. Is it OK?
>>
>> Your test fails for Thumb multilibs.
>>
>> Other than that, ok.
>>
> Here is the updated patch, with test cases updated. The method used in
> the tests to make them work with thumb is Paul's idea. I will commit on
> trunk and 4.5 branch soon.
>
Done.

-- 
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-12 14:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-07  5:47 [ARM] Fix prologue and epilogue for interrupt function Jie Zhang
2010-07-07 13:50 ` Paul Brook
2010-07-12 13:41   ` Jie Zhang
2010-07-12 14:06     ` Jie Zhang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).