From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22836 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2010 21:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 22824 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2010 21:26:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:26:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6FLQ8ju030556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:26:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6FLQ8OQ013953; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:26:08 -0400 Received: from [172.17.76.3] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6FLQ75o023625; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:26:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4C3F7CEE.5010408@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:26:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Schmidt CC: GCC Patches Subject: Re: Emit more REG_EQUIV notes for function args (PR42235) References: <4C3D9C06.60901@codesourcery.com> <4C3E07EF.1030306@redhat.com> <4C3E2C62.40808@codesourcery.com> <4C3E39F0.7050208@redhat.com> <4C3F41BA.7070905@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4C3F41BA.7070905@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01300.txt.bz2 On 07/15/10 11:13, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 07/15/2010 12:28 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 07/14/10 15:30, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> >>> If necessary I can try to test for a single insn with single_set and >>> push it to the sequence otherwise. >>> >>> >> For the mn103, the conversions were single insns... >> >> Ultimately, I think you have to peek at the insn(s) and see what >> registers they set/clobber. >> > How's this? Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux. ARM tests in progress. > OK. Jeff