public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	       Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit 	Linux/x86
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C59A7A7.3070300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=HiHsDB0HFf1JEDVBVQznn6f4w8Y6tpAsZKWi1@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/04/2010 06:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Can we find if oprofile works with -fomit-frame-pointer on 32bit Linux/x86.
>>
>> It doesn't for user space. The problem is that you would need
>> an in kernel dwarf2 unwinder that reads user space tables.
>>
>> x86-64 suffers from this already.
> 

> But it is considered acceptable

By whom?

> so that we still want -fomit-frame-pointer for Linux/x86-64.

Ah, so your argument *is* "x86-64 profiling is degraded, so we might
as well degrade x86 as well."

Andrew.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-04 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-26 16:41 H.J. Lu
2010-08-02 17:55 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03  9:18   ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-03  9:38     ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-03 14:03       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 14:18         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-03 14:28           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 15:13             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-03 15:35               ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 14:05     ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 14:11       ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 17:12         ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 17:24           ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-03 17:29             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 17:57             ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 13:21               ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 14:29                 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 14:44                   ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 14:48                   ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-08-04 15:00               ` Jan Hubicka
2010-08-04 15:54                 ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 16:08                 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 16:23                   ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:05                     ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:06                       ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:08                         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-09 12:07                           ` Mark Wielaard
2010-08-04 17:07                       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:09                         ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:12                           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:15                             ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:20                               ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:08                       ` Chris Lattner
2010-08-04 17:36                   ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 17:41                     ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:47                       ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2010-08-04 17:53                         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 18:05                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 18:12                           ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 18:18                             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-17  1:47                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-08-03 17:58             ` David Daney
2010-08-03 17:25           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 17:48             ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 18:18           ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-04 18:52 Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 19:24   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 19:25   ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-04 20:39   ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 20:57     ` David Daney
2010-08-04 21:09       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 21:16         ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 22:07           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 22:16             ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 22:45             ` David Daney
2010-08-05  7:00               ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 23:11         ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-05  7:23           ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 21:13       ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-12 16:22 H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 16:28 ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 16:35 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 16:52   ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:03     ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:07       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:12         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:13           ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:20             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:26         ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 17:39           ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:39             ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 17:46               ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 17:58                 ` IainS
2010-08-12 18:22                   ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 17:50               ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 23:02               ` Mike Stump
2013-01-30 22:24 ` Ryan Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C59A7A7.3070300@redhat.com \
    --to=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).