From: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [ARM] [3/3] Implement TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB2C054.5050408@codesourcery.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 166 bytes --]
This patch implements TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL for ARM. With the changes of
the previous two patches, this one is straightforward.
Is it OK?
--
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery
[-- Attachment #2: gcc-arm-target-builtin-decl.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3829 bytes --]
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_builtin_decl): Declare.
(TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL): Define.
(enum arm_builtins): Correct ARM_BUILTIN_MAX.
(arm_builtin_decls[]): New.
(arm_init_neon_builtins): Store builtin declarations in
arm_builtin_decls[].
(arm_init_iwmmxt_builtins): Likewise.
(arm_init_tls_builtins): Likewise.
(arm_builtin_decl): New.
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 432da46..c9d6a64 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static rtx safe_vector_operand (rtx, enum machine_mode);
static rtx arm_expand_binop_builtin (enum insn_code, tree, rtx);
static rtx arm_expand_unop_builtin (enum insn_code, tree, rtx, int);
static rtx arm_expand_builtin (tree, rtx, rtx, enum machine_mode, int);
+static tree arm_builtin_decl (unsigned, bool);
static void emit_constant_insn (rtx cond, rtx pattern);
static rtx emit_set_insn (rtx, rtx);
static int arm_arg_partial_bytes (CUMULATIVE_ARGS *, enum machine_mode,
@@ -391,6 +392,8 @@ static const struct attribute_spec arm_attribute_table[] =
#define TARGET_INIT_BUILTINS arm_init_builtins
#undef TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN
#define TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN arm_expand_builtin
+#undef TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL
+#define TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL arm_builtin_decl
#undef TARGET_INIT_LIBFUNCS
#define TARGET_INIT_LIBFUNCS arm_init_libfuncs
@@ -18009,14 +18012,16 @@ enum arm_builtins
ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE,
- ARM_BUILTIN_MAX = ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE /* FIXME: Wrong! */
+ ARM_BUILTIN_MAX = ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE + ARRAY_SIZE (neon_builtin_data)
};
+static GTY(()) tree arm_builtin_decls[ARM_BUILTIN_MAX];
static void
arm_init_neon_builtins (void)
{
- unsigned int i, fcode = ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE;
+ unsigned int i, fcode;
+ tree decl;
tree neon_intQI_type_node;
tree neon_intHI_type_node;
@@ -18264,7 +18269,9 @@ arm_init_neon_builtins (void)
}
}
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (neon_builtin_data); i++)
+ for (i = 0, fcode = ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE;
+ i < ARRAY_SIZE (neon_builtin_data);
+ i++, fcode++)
{
neon_builtin_datum *d = &neon_builtin_data[i];
const char* const modenames[] = {
@@ -18496,8 +18503,9 @@ arm_init_neon_builtins (void)
sprintf (namebuf, "__builtin_neon_%s%s", d->name, modenames[d->mode]);
- add_builtin_function (namebuf, ftype, fcode++, BUILT_IN_MD, NULL,
- NULL_TREE);
+ decl = add_builtin_function (namebuf, ftype, fcode, BUILT_IN_MD, NULL,
+ NULL_TREE);
+ arm_builtin_decls[fcode] = decl;
}
}
@@ -18505,8 +18513,11 @@ arm_init_neon_builtins (void)
do \
{ \
if ((MASK) & insn_flags) \
- add_builtin_function ((NAME), (TYPE), (CODE), \
- BUILT_IN_MD, NULL, NULL_TREE); \
+ { \
+ decl = add_builtin_function ((NAME), (TYPE), (CODE), \
+ BUILT_IN_MD, NULL, NULL_TREE); \
+ arm_builtin_decls[CODE] = decl; \
+ } \
} \
while (0)
@@ -18652,6 +18663,7 @@ arm_init_iwmmxt_builtins (void)
{
const struct builtin_description * d;
size_t i;
+ tree decl;
tree endlink = void_list_node;
tree V2SI_type_node = build_vector_type_for_mode (intSI_type_node, V2SImode);
@@ -18981,6 +18993,7 @@ arm_init_tls_builtins (void)
NULL, NULL_TREE);
TREE_NOTHROW (decl) = 1;
TREE_READONLY (decl) = 1;
+ arm_builtin_decls[ARM_BUILTIN_THREAD_POINTER] = decl;
}
static void
@@ -19007,6 +19020,17 @@ arm_init_builtins (void)
arm_init_fp16_builtins ();
}
+/* Return the ARM builtin for CODE. */
+
+static tree
+arm_builtin_decl (unsigned code, bool initialize_p ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ if (code >= ARM_BUILTIN_MAX)
+ return error_mark_node;
+
+ return arm_builtin_decls[code];
+}
+
/* Implement TARGET_INVALID_PARAMETER_TYPE. */
static const char *
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 7:44 Jie Zhang [this message]
2011-04-18 14:19 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-04-22 8:52 ` Jie Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB2C054.5050408@codesourcery.com \
--to=jie@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).