From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21427 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2010 12:24:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 21414 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2010 12:24:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:24:16 +0000 Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so2299484qwe.20 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.20.13 with SMTP id d13mr1002144qab.186.1287577454275; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com [209.132.186.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mz11sm126247qcb.27.2010.10.20.05.24.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CBEDF6B.9080008@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:40:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.1.3-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR bootstrap/45954: LTO isn't enabled in stage1 cc1 with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto References: <4CBE8B78.8010003@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01713.txt.bz2 On 10/20/2010 02:23 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 10/20/2010 01:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:07 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This patch enables lto for stage1 if LTO is enabled. OK for trunk? >> >> Maybe >> >> boot_language=$enable_lto >> >> in gcc/config/lto/config-lang.in is enough? >> > > It works. OK for trunk? Yes. Paolo