From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-276235-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22233 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2010 17:31:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 22218 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2010 17:31:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_BJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:31:02 +0000
Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so2047991wwb.8        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.17.130 with SMTP id j2mr943350wej.47.1287855059062;        Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w41sm2853369weq.8.2010.10.23.10.30.56        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);        Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CC32149.9030007@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:41:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
CC: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,  GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, dj@redhat.com, kai.tietz@onevision.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v4] Use cygwin spawn functions
References: <4CB3AEC5.3090209@redhat.com> <4CB791AE.9080303@redhat.com> <4CBA02C4.9050801@redhat.com> <4CC319AF.6070501@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010231703500.17608@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4CC31F3F.5060607@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC31F3F.5060607@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02050.txt.bz2

On 23/10/2010 18:45, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 23/10/2010 18:04, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>>   It might be suitable to address this in gcc by adding "-Wl,--stack,4194304"
>>> or simlar to the host build flags.  Or there could be some kind of bug or
>> Toplevel config/mh-{mingw,cygwin} already contain
>>
>> LDFLAGS += -Wl,--stack,8388608
>>
>> for this purpose.
>>
> 
>   It's not working:
> 
>> admin@ubik /gnu/gcc/obj-lto
>> $ objdump -p gcc/cc1.exe | grep Stack
>> SizeOfStackReserve      00200000
>> SizeOfStackCommit       00001000
>>
>> admin@ubik /gnu/gcc/obj-lto
>> $
> 
>   (I'm sure we've had this discussion before in a java-related context.)

  Yep, found it(*).  The top-level config/mh-* flags are only used for stage1,
that's why.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
(*) - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00881.html
and related thread.