From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4204 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2010 05:12:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 4194 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2010 05:12:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:12:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 29820 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 05:12:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (yao@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Nov 2010 05:12:06 -0000 Message-ID: <4CD24091.1020904@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:31:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Ping] [patch 0/3] New macro PREFERRED_RENAME_CLASS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 I sent three patches to add some logic in register-rename pass to prefer for different register classes. After some reviewers' review, three patches are updated and refactored like this, Patch 1: does everything except adding target hook preferred_rename_class . It is a separate improvement to register-rename. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02197.html Patch 2: add target hook with doc, and use this hook in regrename.c http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00029.html Patch 3: it is arm specific patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01785.html Middle-End maintainers, could you review patch 1 and patch 2? -- Yao Qi CodeSourcery yao@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x739