From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25184 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2010 09:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25168 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2010 09:28:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from taro.utanet.at (HELO taro.utanet.at) (213.90.36.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:28:20 +0000 Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POoPi-0001Yq-7z; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:28:18 +0100 Received: from d83-187-160-20.cust.tele2.at ([83.187.160.20] helo=[10.0.0.18]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POoPi-0002Wi-5A; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:28:18 +0100 Message-ID: <4CFA0B54.5090101@domob.eu> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Kraft User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Burnus CC: Fortran List , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/46794: Fix ICE with powers of integers References: <4CF97314.4000206@domob.eu> <4CFA00A1.6020101@net-b.de> In-Reply-To: <4CFA00A1.6020101@net-b.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 Hi Tobias, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> Regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without failures -- >> though the run somehow looked strange to me (on the compile-farm); >> I'll try again to be sure. Ok for trunk? > > OK for the trunk. Can you check whether one needs to likewise for the > 4.5 and 4.4 branch? (I think one should check on source level - the > verify_tree might not always catch it. For some reasons, it ICEs here > with 4.4 and 4.6 but not with 4.5; however, I think that's rather by > chance and not because of a proper casting.) No further problems with the regtest, thanks for the review! I committed as rev. 167453 to trunk. I will look at the source for 4.4 and 4.5 accordingly. Yours, Daniel -- http://www.pro-vegan.info/ -- Done: Arc-Bar-Cav-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz To go: Hea-Mon-Pri