From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20194 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2011 16:27:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20185 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2011 16:27:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:27:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p13GR3Dt006774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:27:04 -0500 Received: from anchor.twiddle.home (ovpn-113-141.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.141]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p13GR3n4029739; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:27:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4AD757.90308@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:27:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IainS CC: Jakub Jelinek , Jeff Law , Richard Guenther , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20110203115855.GR30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4D4AD45F.7060008@redhat.com> <20110203162041.GS30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <23E2F999-12EC-4569-98DA-0A542A17FEF1@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <23E2F999-12EC-4569-98DA-0A542A17FEF1@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 On 02/03/2011 08:24 AM, IainS wrote: >> Well, it perhaps could be just SECTION_MACH_DEP, at least I can't see any >> reasons why it couldn't, just the assert required that it was bigger: > > hmm, > won't that output.h to be before every instance of darwin.h? No, just so long as it's included before SECTION_NO_ANCHOR is used. What's in darwin.h is merely a macro definition, not a "real" use. > .... I can if you like, Please. r~