From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29853 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 15:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 29845 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 15:32:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:32:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SFWPLO024838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:26 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1SFWPSe022965; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:25 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.13] ([10.3.113.13]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1SFWOZM029815; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4D6BC008.1040103@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:07:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20110228085241.GH30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110228085241.GH30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg01735.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/11 01:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > PR46790 P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01410.html > (or http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01426.html ) > workaround for older ld --gc-sections issues I prefer the first patch (test for buggy linker). OK for trunk. Thanks, Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNa8AHAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7Z6wH/3iYC0d2whnamRRn2DUVZriA qsXxlCo2w1e/VAV3HRh48sgUz3AT5ZcCWGJZY6tRQoEWPIWOyc5g2xyGA8XSlDdP GfvV4QiUgREtw+U65Pp9NXaUFwx3Yv5Y8npAkzRU7WMncdrrjk+mz49uhyo6IbXE TlOaY+7hYvaBKsu5GOjo5peTKaNZWDuWrb180mz3oJa+/p8cFTMVaQVwZXfUzgC1 DCBO5Zrg1ppZMT6QMGvASJutKJ3QDZ5ySjf01XllpdoKIhO6FXt+uTD7i53AWAih QnnrUD9GC/AHcsmY37D02DYEkraiCd63J6LcfkucYKHhR+psjFjyVo7Oybyk0yw= =/1tY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----