From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22768 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 16:49:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22739 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 16:49:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:49:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SGnJgY008763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:49:19 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SGnIAu015667; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:49:18 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.13] ([10.3.113.13]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1SGnHXA005201; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:49:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4D6BD20C.5070902@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:12:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20110228085241.GH30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110228085241.GH30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg01743.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/11 01:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > PR47893 P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01647.html > add_frame_space vs. temp_slot tracking of stack slots Approved. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNa9IMAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7NEUH/ioHe9fL9h0MTcfz/yCbOYG0 91YtPFh0zXide3Rt+DBvgooNd3fk5PdXT2dhkiXpP0IktlOMJJYwXjbH2CtR/Ny0 g2Kb4eQxAHRfjoty3v3CmYIV1Z+pMihSTXc5Zp143o2ysOHHgqGoS+LwpQYPPni3 ZNtliHZwLe+3jNT//pr0sv8qbGkg6e+L69ZAncM+RYnOpHZAwiOKzfr8h3z0xgoh 9P2SGF9aXLDrEYkkvj3W3Awy3BcsHdFIoxJM2AyZ9qwvo9ygQmd9LCs6CRnVL6Md vgCp3zuFNZ2r8BenduNd4ooZk4jn2hblaQDK+cc4Sp+hoDbalqx6u2mLKrGD2go= =AOuT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----