From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] move REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE to be a field of lang_identifier
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7A58FE.5080007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110311162348.GM23686@codesourcery.com>
On 03/11/2011 11:23 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Hm. OK. Just as a light sketch of how this would all work, where do
> DEPENDENT_NAME_EXPRs get introduced into the AST? During parsing, or
> someplace else?
During parsing, yes, wherever we look up a name and currently return the
plain identifier rather than a decl.
> What about those cases where the FE does TREE_TYPE
> (DECL_NAME (X))--are those supposed to be REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE
Kind of. It seems like there are two uses:
1) Remembering that we've seen a declaration of a type with this name.
2) Remembering which type a particular tinfo or conversion op name
corresponds to.
It probably makes sense for #2 to use a new and different macro.
> There's also cases like:
>
> --- a/gcc/cp/error.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/error.c
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ dump_decl (tree t, int flags)
> {
> pp_cxx_ws_string (cxx_pp, "operator");
> /* Not exactly IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE. */
> - dump_type (TREE_TYPE (t), flags);
> + dump_type (REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE (t), flags);
> break;
> }
> else
That's #2.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 4:23 [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from SSA_NAME nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:06 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 4:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from CONSTRUCTOR nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 07/18] generalize build_case_label to the rest of the compiler Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:01 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11 13:10 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 14:56 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 03/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from *_CST nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 16/18] make TS_IDENTIFIER be a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:12 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 17:21 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 14/18] move TS_STATEMENT_LIST to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 6:01 ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 12:23 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 08/18] convert cp *FOR_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 06/18] define CASE_CHAIN accessor for CASE_LABEL_EXPR Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:07 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 10/18] convert cp SWITCH_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 15/18] move REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE to be a field of lang_identifier Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:40 ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 14:04 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 14:20 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:04 ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 16:23 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 17:17 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2011-03-11 14:41 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 01/18] add typed_tree structure Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:21 ` Michael Matz
2011-03-11 4:24 ` [PATCH 13/18] move TS_EXP to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-05-11 0:34 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-17 17:51 ` [PING][PATCH " Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 14:58 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 15:34 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-24 18:52 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-25 9:59 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 4:30 ` [PATCH 11/18] mark EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION as typed only Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:30 ` [PATCH 09/18] convert cp IF_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:31 ` [PATCH 18/18] make TS_BLOCK a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-05-26 18:30 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 4:31 ` [PATCH 02/18] enforce TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE accesses Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 8:12 ` Mike Stump
2011-03-11 13:21 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:24 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:13 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-21 13:50 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-21 17:50 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-13 2:43 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-04-13 2:57 ` Diego Novillo
2011-04-13 4:02 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-03-11 4:31 ` [PATCH 17/18] introduce block_chainon and use BLOCK_CHAIN more Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:15 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:19 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:14 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:23 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-11 4:50 ` [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:19 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 20:08 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-10 20:19 ` Diego Novillo
2011-05-11 9:21 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 19:22 ` H.J. Lu
2011-03-11 8:18 ` [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Mike Stump
2011-03-11 16:00 ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:25 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:42 ` Nathan Froyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D7A58FE.5080007@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).