From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-287621-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14706 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2011 18:27:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 14696 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2011 18:27:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:26:58 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2NIQvS7015247	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:26:57 -0400
Received: from anchor.twiddle.home (ovpn-113-104.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.104])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2NIQuMf017813;	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:26:56 -0400
Message-ID: <4D8A3B6F.2040708@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:27:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,        Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,        Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR other/48007: Unwind library doesn't work with UNITS_PER_WORD > sizeof (void *)
References: <201103221930.p2MJUTrr032489@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>	<mcr8vw6re9d.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTi=K+u8m76-1M195UWU2fVvgwbb0AGnRh4et-N3G@mail.gmail.com>	<mcrtyeuo2v7.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTik_TUCL1X-MjL5C+wSyoMNwpYTC=mYSVeujNyL7@mail.gmail.com>	<4D8A32EB.6000105@redhat.com>	<20110323180437.GP18914@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>	<4D8A39E8.30204@redhat.com> <AANLkTikP4YuWK3GO395SFxykRkjVbJPz18JbmfBdJkjU@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikP4YuWK3GO395SFxykRkjVbJPz18JbmfBdJkjU@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01534.txt.bz2

On 03/23/2011 11:24 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> FWIW, I ran into this on x32, which is totally new and doesn't have
> backward compatibility issue.

I don't care.  I'm not going to totally destroy maintainability for
the sake of one target.  There shall be a common solution.


r~