From: Tom de Vries <vries@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 3/9] Cleanup.
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D95EC07.60807@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D95E5A7.7090201@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 340 bytes --]
On 04/01/2011 05:01 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Reposting, with ChangeLog.
>
> Similarly one of your patches had
> * gcc/cfgcleanup.c (whatever): Whatever.
> in the ChangeLog, should be just
> * cfgcleanup.c (whatever): Whatever.
>
> Jakub
Fixed ChangeLog.
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 3_crossjump-cleanup-ml.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1401 bytes --]
2011-04-01 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR target/43920
* cfgcleanup.c (try_crossjump_bb): Remove 2 superfluous variables.
diff -u gcc/cfgcleanup.c gcc/cfgcleanup.c
--- gcc/cfgcleanup.c (working copy)
+++ gcc/cfgcleanup.c (working copy)
@@ -1961,7 +1961,6 @@
edge e, e2, fallthru;
bool changed;
unsigned max, ix, ix2;
- basic_block ev, ev2;
/* Nothing to do if there is not at least two incoming edges. */
if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds) < 2)
@@ -2001,9 +2000,9 @@
fallthru = find_fallthru_edge (bb->preds);
changed = false;
- for (ix = 0, ev = bb; ix < EDGE_COUNT (ev->preds); )
+ for (ix = 0; ix < EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds);)
{
- e = EDGE_PRED (ev, ix);
+ e = EDGE_PRED (bb, ix);
ix++;
/* As noted above, first try with the fallthru predecessor (or, a
@@ -2021,7 +2020,6 @@
{
changed = true;
ix = 0;
- ev = bb;
continue;
}
}
@@ -2045,10 +2043,9 @@
if (EDGE_SUCC (e->src, 0) != e)
continue;
- for (ix2 = 0, ev2 = bb; ix2 < EDGE_COUNT (ev2->preds); )
+ for (ix2 = 0; ix2 < EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds); ix2++)
{
- e2 = EDGE_PRED (ev2, ix2);
- ix2++;
+ e2 = EDGE_PRED (bb, ix2);
if (e2 == e)
continue;
@@ -2071,7 +2068,6 @@
if (try_crossjump_to_edge (mode, e, e2))
{
changed = true;
- ev2 = bb;
ix = 0;
break;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-01 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-31 18:27 [PATCH, PR43920] Improve code-size optimizations Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:29 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 1/9] ARM specific part Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 14:46 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 15:19 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-04-01 16:06 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-02 7:47 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-02 17:06 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-03 7:38 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-03 17:03 ` Tom de Vries
[not found] ` <BANLkTikEruAfGJ392FXtasLv6-yV2tYSRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-04 12:14 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-04 12:23 ` Rainer Orth
2011-04-05 13:35 ` Tom de Vries
2011-05-03 18:19 ` Rainer Orth
2011-04-03 18:40 ` Mike Stump
2011-03-31 18:31 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 14:47 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 15:17 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 15:34 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-04-01 16:10 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-05 10:43 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-05 12:20 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-04-06 10:48 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-04-06 12:29 ` Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:35 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 4-9/9] Cross-jumping Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:36 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 4/9] Cross-jumping - Don't count use or clobber Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:40 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 19:09 ` Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 19:19 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 14:48 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-04 19:11 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:42 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 5/9] Cross-jumping - Add missing use of return register Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:52 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 14:49 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-04 19:11 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 6/9] Cross-jumping - Use reg-notes Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:56 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 21:25 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 14:54 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-04 16:14 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-06 17:41 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:45 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 7/9] Cross-jumping - Extend search scope Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:58 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-05 11:44 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 14:55 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-05 21:45 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:46 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 8/9] Cross-jumping - Extend search scope - test case Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 19:00 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 14:56 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 15:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-04-01 15:18 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 16:14 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-05 21:46 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:56 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 9/9] Cross-jumping - Allow both directions Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 19:02 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 14:56 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-05 21:46 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 18:35 ` [PATCH, PR43920, 3/9] Cleanup Tom de Vries
2011-03-31 18:43 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 14:48 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 15:15 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2011-04-04 18:26 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 21:16 ` [PATCH, PR43920] Improve code-size optimizations Eric Botcazou
2011-04-01 15:06 ` Tom de Vries
2011-04-01 16:06 ` Eric Botcazou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D95EC07.60807@codesourcery.com \
--to=vries@codesourcery.com \
--cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=maxim@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).