From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6268 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2011 10:43:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 6256 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2011 10:43:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:42:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 20605 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 10:42:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.66?) (vries@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Apr 2011 10:42:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4D9AF22E.7030000@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:43:00 -0000 From: Tom de Vries User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Earnshaw CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case References: <4D94C603.7080505@codesourcery.com> <4D94C787.4060207@codesourcery.com> <4D95E587.8090404@codesourcery.com> <1301672077.4104.15.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D95F905.6010901@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4D95F905.6010901@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 Hi Richard, On 04/01/2011 06:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 04/01/2011 05:34 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:47 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> Reposting, with ChangeLog. >> >> +/* { dg-options "-march=armv7-a -mthumb -Os" } */ >> >> No, use dg-require-effective-target. The above doesn't work properly >> with multilib testing. >> > > Changed it into: > > +/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os" } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2_ok } */ > Is this updated version ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00058.html ) ok for trunk? Thanks, - Tom