From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21841 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2011 12:29:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 21831 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2011 12:29:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:29:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 23459 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2011 12:29:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.66?) (vries@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 6 Apr 2011 12:29:33 -0000 Message-ID: <4D9C5CA7.6080805@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:29:00 -0000 From: Tom de Vries User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: Richard Earnshaw , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case References: <4D94C603.7080505@codesourcery.com> <4D94C787.4060207@codesourcery.com> <4D95E587.8090404@codesourcery.com> <1301672077.4104.15.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D95F905.6010901@codesourcery.com> <4D9AF22E.7030000@codesourcery.com> <4D9C44E8.6010103@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <4D9C44E8.6010103@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 On 04/06/2011 12:48 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > >> Is this updated version ( >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00058.html ) ok for trunk? > > I think you accidentally applied the patch twice and committed it. That is exactly what happened, according to my history: ... 1877 patch -p0 < ../patches/arm-size-branch_cost.test.patch 1878 patch -p0 < ../patches/arm-size-branch_cost.test.patch 1879 svn add gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-1.c ... > Yeah > unfortunately there is no equivalent of git clean -f -d in svn unless > you write something up with svn status and some shell scripting foo... > > I've now fixed this up with > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg00224.html > Sorry about that, and thanks a lot! Thanks, - Tom