From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11890 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2011 23:42:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11869 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2011 23:42:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from omr-m33.mx.aol.com (HELO omr-m33.mx.aol.com) (64.12.143.145) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:42:47 +0000 Received: from oms-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (oms-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com [64.12.102.137]) by omr-m33.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p3ANcIN2006481; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:38:18 -0400 Received: from mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.5]) by oms-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTP id 302E71C000085; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:38:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (30-209.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.1.209.30]) by mtaout-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id DD316E0000A4; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:38:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DA23FA1.5020401@netscape.net> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:42:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?= Reply-To: LpSolit@netscape.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Wakely CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , Gerald Pfeifer , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_L=F3pez-Ib=E1=F1ez?= , Steve Kargl , Jakub Jelinek , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla? References: <20100925054454.GA81084@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20100925084632.GK2652@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20100925142844.GB83390@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4DA23482.4000400@netscape.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit x-aol-global-disposition: S X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:291265696:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d29054da23f681da1 X-AOL-IP: 85.1.209.30 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 Le 11. 04. 11 01:33, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : > Most of those cases are the reporter changing the status to VERIFIED > after a gcc maintainer has set it to RESOLVED. That doesn't mean the > maintainers use VERIFIED of that keeping it is useful. If they are useless, then they should be removed to avoid confusion and to make queries easier. But if we keep them, then they should be described as any other bug status. An external user cannot guess that they have no special meaning for you. Frédéric