From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30741 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 14:58:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30732 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 14:58:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:58:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3EEwRq8024526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:58:27 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.3.113.3]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3EEwRNP023873 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:58:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4DA70B92.4090909@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:58:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches List Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/48557 (SFINAE failure with void operands) References: <4DA70B4F.2000705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DA70B4F.2000705@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01082.txt.bz2 On 04/14/2011 10:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > We were just failing to check complain for this one error. Er, actually that's the next patch. For this one, we were complaining in decay_conversion about misuse of void. I noticed that some other places avoid calling that on void operands, so that's what I did here as well. Jason