From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28410 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2011 15:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 28391 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2011 15:21:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from out01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net (HELO out01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net) (66.133.183.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:21:01 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFFhqE0yI+jm/2dsb2JhbACmA8UwhW4EhWCMJw Received: from relay01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164]) by out01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2011 15:20:59 +0000 X-Previous-IP: 50.35.232.230 Received: from quava.localdomain (unknown [50.35.232.230]) by relay01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D5E703FEA7; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DA86258.4080707@frontier.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:26:00 -0000 From: Jerry DeLisle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Matz CC: Dominique Dhumieres , paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Implement stack arrays even for unknown sizes References: <20110409100809.BF9CD3BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20110412063517.2094B3BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20110414210403.F14F23BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20110415133527.B4DD13BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01204.txt.bz2 On 04/15/2011 07:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote: --- snip --- > > I'll make the DECL_EXPR conditional on the size being variable. As Tobias > already okayed the patch I'm planning to check in the slightly modified > variant as below, after a new round of testing. > Thats A-OK Thanks, Jerry