From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3988 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2011 19:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3979 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2011 19:03:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:02:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 14816 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 19:02:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Apr 2011 19:02:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4DAC8AD5.8080803@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:52:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Hubicka CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [c++] Remove redundant inline check References: <20110418184702.GN5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20110418184702.GN5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01445.txt.bz2 On 4/18/2011 11:47 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK? > > * cp/semantics.c (finish_goto_stmt): Do set UNINLINABLE flag on computed > gotos. Provided that we have this check elsewhere in the compiler and are therefore confident we won't accidentally inline such things, this is fine. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713