From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19101 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2011 22:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19079 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2011 22:08:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (HELO cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de) (89.1.8.212) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:08:01 +0000 Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201]) by cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB86212C17; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.197] (xdsl-78-35-132-210.netcologne.de [78.35.132.210]) by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D04511E87; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:07:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DB7423C.6040106@netcologne.de> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:31:00 -0000 From: Thomas Koenig User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikael Morin CC: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Make block names unique References: <4DB1E003.6000304@netcologne.de> <4DB5F868.6040208@netcologne.de> <201104262327.31697.mikael.morin@sfr.fr> In-Reply-To: <201104262327.31697.mikael.morin@sfr.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg02073.txt.bz2 Hi Mikael, >>> * decl.c (gfc_match_end): Check that the block name starts >>> with "block@". >>> * parse.c (gfc_build_block_ns): Make block names unique by >>> numbering them. >> >> Ping ** 0.25? >> >> Thomas > OK > Waiting for Emacs... Sending fortran/ChangeLog Sending fortran/decl.c Sending fortran/parse.c Transmitting file data ... Committed revision 172990. Thanks for the review! Thomas