From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25407 invoked by alias); 14 May 2011 16:41:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 25397 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2011 16:41:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 16:41:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4EGf63Y016095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 14 May 2011 12:41:06 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn-113-120.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.120]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4EGf5KM006544; Sat, 14 May 2011 12:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4DCEB0A1.8040200@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 22:50:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ville Voutilainen CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] C++0x, implement final on classes References: <87liyav7hf.wl%ville@ville-laptop> <4DCD6E7C.4070302@redhat.com> <4DCD74E0.9090303@redhat.com> <87r582w6w7.wl%ville@ville-laptop> <87liy9nxf1.wl%ville@ville-laptop> In-Reply-To: <87liy9nxf1.wl%ville@ville-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg01055.txt.bz2 On 05/14/2011 10:56 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > At Sat, 14 May 2011 09:01:39 +0200, > Paolo Carlini wrote: >> ... I'm wondering if wouldn't be more appropriate for the new testcase to be in /cpp0x, with a name like final.C > > There are probably other tests there that need moving too, > if such moving is done. I don't have a strong opinion > either way, but maybe the moving should be done separately? Paolo is right, C++0x tests go in cpp0x. I'll move this and your earlier one. Jason