From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5434 invoked by alias); 26 May 2011 17:06:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 5422 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2011 17:06:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:06:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4QH6VG2024033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 13:06:32 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4QGfNVV007563; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:41:24 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.150] (ovpn-113-150.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.150]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4QGfMTb006025; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:41:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4DDE82B2.5090204@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:59:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Makarov CC: gcc-patches Subject: Re: RFA: a patch for PR49154 References: <4DDD7429.7010201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DDD7429.7010201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02075.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/25/11 15:27, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch solves problem > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for SPARC. SPARC FPCC > registers were excluded from pressure classes because the movement > between them is costly. Therefore the assert was triggered again. > Common logic says that it should be a pressure class because the > registers are common and that is attributed that the class has no > subclasses. > > The patch was bootstrapped on x86-64 and teststed on the same targets > (about 10 of them) + regular SPARC (without soft floating point). > > > Ok to commit? > > 2011-05-25 Vladimir Makarov > > PR rtl-optimization/49154 > * ira.c (setup_pressure_classes): Process class without sublcasses > as a candidate for pressure classes. OK Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3oKyAAoJEBRtltQi2kC767sH/2V5jrDzAt4zDLpS1go78QBq l03YV1rfy/MG19HBcFcS0rNcGXHUobo0dQxS8woqY75GOmU29HpLuyh5ps6l18gK YX4gWvbJADnOK9eyFQ0TjdGLAZCx6w4SMcIpUpurYh8e6iFqBUbHEf+KvO5bIhiE EkXhMcMy3fX/EWmvK7kJWkKGAxYDI3mvyz6RUB0oMlgK1PcW5eW7IQWPXnerHRTi dNdaVZ6VUiJVPyehKKxfIAsmZM6K0R6q6jYsAGx+ewOtjRq5Vz6gQkAhJKgZ7uGM 747LXBlLRmyS9giGehviqPsep5m5/u2eb/uiVu4ypAGUj7iFeePJY6B1tbiPETA= =5Ps1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----