From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27470 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 19:32:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 27461 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 19:32:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:32:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p59JWDmi028499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:32:13 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.3.113.14]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p59JWCkg019708; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF11FBC.3010304@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:47:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Guenther CC: Richard Guenther , gcc-patches List Subject: Re: RFA (fold): PATCH for c++/49290 (folding *(T*)(ar+10)) References: <4DEDB98F.6010508@redhat.com> <4DEE2DCF.7020905@redhat.com> <4DEE3484.8030101@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DEE3484.8030101@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 On 06/07/2011 10:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 06/07/2011 10:05 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> In that case you could do what Jakub suggested - but only for rvalues >> of course. > > Right, and I need to handle lvalues as well. > >> Can't you instead adjust the type you feed to fold_indirect_ref_1 in >> the caller in the C++ FE? > > Not without digging down into the operand to see what type it wants. At > that point I might as well just copy the whole function into the FE. Ping? Jason