From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-294295-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21343 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2011 17:52:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 21326 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2011 17:52:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:51:46 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5DHpjcn026430	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:51:45 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn-113-40.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.40])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5DHpims011795;	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:51:44 -0400
Message-ID: <4DF64E30.7020601@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:59:00 -0000
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
CC: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>,        gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA (fold): PATCH for c++/49290 (folding *(T*)(ar+10))
References: <4DEDB98F.6010508@redhat.com>	<BANLkTimU_JPKgaqvhtb+m7fbDyTL340YJQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4DEE2DCF.7020905@redhat.com>	<BANLkTi=FX60RhEj2QF=t9MvkUCHR=D1m1A@mail.gmail.com>	<4DEE3484.8030101@redhat.com>	<4DF11FBC.3010304@redhat.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1106101029320.810@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<4DF223D4.3080700@redhat.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1106101602530.810@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<4DF22656.9050700@redhat.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1106101619070.810@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<4DF3C98B.6070006@redhat.com>	<BANLkTin8o9=mfL80u_MaWMSDyCYa61vdpQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4DF5396B.6070502@redhat.com> <BANLkTiktV8ALouS2B2e5pLKQF3j4tSHB-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTiktV8ALouS2B2e5pLKQF3j4tSHB-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00980.txt.bz2

On 06/13/2011 06:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> But I suppose you want the array-ref be folded to a constant eventually?

Right.

I'm not going to keep arguing about VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, but that brings 
me back to my original question: is it OK to add a permissive mode to 
the function, or should I copy the whole thing into the front end?

Jason