From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@gjlay.de>
Cc: Denis Chertykov <chertykov@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Anatoly Sokolov <aesok@post.ru>,
"Eric B. Weddington" <eric.weddington@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, AVR]: Fix PR46779
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF92AEA.4000906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF918A9.4070003@gjlay.de>
On 06/15/2011 01:40 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> But I still wonder what's the very problem. Any architecture has
> limited reg+const addressing and limited number of address
> registers. I definetely saw architectures run out of registers and
> reload manages to access stack beyond reg+maxoff without any hacks
> and clear and straight forward backend.
Well, this is probably the only architecture that has *no*
non-fixed, call-saved base registers.
Indeed, I can work around this particular crash by either
hacking Z to be call-saved, or hacking the frame pointer to
not be required. The former of course changes the abi, and
the second produces awful code due to too many copies from
the stack pointer. So neither option is "preferred".
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 17:24 Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-09 18:50 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-09 19:43 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-09 19:51 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-10 10:23 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-12 10:34 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-13 18:10 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-13 22:37 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-14 10:39 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-14 11:38 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-14 21:38 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-14 23:04 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-15 17:58 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-15 21:58 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-15 22:20 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2011-06-16 3:46 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 11:37 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-16 12:01 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-16 14:07 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 18:18 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-16 18:57 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 19:33 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-16 19:42 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 20:04 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-16 14:36 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 14:52 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-06-16 15:13 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-16 18:57 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-23 20:48 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-23 22:04 ` Richard Henderson
2011-06-26 20:03 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-26 20:51 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-27 8:41 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-06-27 9:19 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-27 10:17 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-07-07 9:59 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-07-07 18:21 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-07-08 10:12 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-07-08 10:25 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-07-08 12:16 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-22 3:28 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-06-22 17:03 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-23 12:51 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-06-23 13:00 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-06-09 20:03 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-10 9:27 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-06-21 17:17 ` Georg-Johann Lay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF92AEA.4000906@redhat.com \
--to=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=aesok@post.ru \
--cc=avr@gjlay.de \
--cc=chertykov@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.weddington@atmel.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).