From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32531 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2011 19:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 32407 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2011 19:34:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:34:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5IJYPpk002483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:34:25 -0400 Received: from anchor.twiddle.net (vpn-238-78.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.238.78]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5IJYONX016647; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:34:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4DFCFDC0.1040000@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:49:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew MacLeod CC: Aldy Hernandez , Jakub Jelinek , "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: __sync_swap* with acq/rel/full memory barrier semantics References: <4DDAE516.4010307@redhat.com> <4DE3F8ED.6020109@redhat.com> <4DE7E0A6.9070400@redhat.com> <20110602192514.GA17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4DE7EA11.30306@redhat.com> <4DE8EF17.5020400@redhat.com> <4DFBC33E.60408@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DFBC33E.60408@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01403.txt.bz2 On 06/17/2011 02:12 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > Do we apply this to mainline? or cxx-mem-model and then bring it all > over later when they are all done and "perfected" ? Let's put it over in cxx-mem-model at least until we settle on the interface at least. r~