From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30637 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2011 13:29:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30464 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2011 13:29:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:28:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5KDSv31016209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:28:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.3.113.2]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5KDSuV2031538; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:28:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4DFF4B18.1070101@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:33:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Stump CC: Nathan Froyd , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] parallelize g++ testing a bit more References: <20110617174709.GA3443@nightcrawler> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01457.txt.bz2 On 06/17/2011 08:20 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >> I've done a lot of g++-only testsuite runs lately > > I think it is reasonable to have even more of them, say, if you have 16 cores and just test c++... I wonder what the scaling is like as we approach larger N. :-) In my test runs, one of the libstdc++ batches (normal3) takes longer than any of the g++ batches, so breaking that up would be more effective for me. :) Jason