From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20952 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2011 16:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 20869 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2011 16:15:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:14:47 +0000 Received: by wyg30 with SMTP id 30so930477wyg.20 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.54.6 with SMTP id o6mr887395wbg.61.1310055286380; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (93-34-199-31.ip51.fastwebnet.it [93.34.199.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em16sm1770106wbb.33.2011.07.07.09.14.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E15DB74.1080100@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:19:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kai Tietz CC: GCC Patches , Richard Guenther Subject: Re: [patch tree-optimization]: [3 of 3]: Boolify compares & more References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On 07/07/2011 06:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > + /* We redo folding here one time for allowing to inspect more > + complex reductions. */ > + substitute_and_fold (op_with_constant_singleton_value_range, > + vrp_fold_stmt, false); > + /* We need to mark this second pass to avoid re-entering of same > + edges for switch statments. */ > + in_second_pass = true; > substitute_and_fold (op_with_constant_singleton_value_range, > vrp_fold_stmt, false); > + in_second_pass = false; This needs a much better explanation. Paolo