From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Paul Koning <paul_koning@dell.com>
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Shrink-wrapping
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E15E61C.7010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F44E3CB9-48C7-44B1-B418-9691428A6661@dell.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/11 10:58, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>>> It'd also be nice to get rid of all these big blocks of code that are
>>> conditional on preprocessor macros, but I realise you're just following
>>> existing practice in the surrounding code, so again it can be left to
>>> a future cleanup.
>>
>> Yeah, this function is quite horrid - so many different paths through it.
>>
>> However, it looks like the only target without HAVE_prologue is actually
>> pdp11, so we're carrying some unnecessary baggage for purely
>> retrocomputing purposes. Paul, can you fix that?
>
> Sure, but... I searched for HAVE_prologue and I can't find any place that set it. There are tests for it, but I see nothing that defines it (other than df-scan.c which defines it as zero if it's not defined, not sure what the point of that is).
>
> I must be missing something...
Isn't it defined by the insn-foo generators based on the existence of a
prologue/epilogue insn in the MD file?
jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFeYcAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7VGgIALj386a0t+LMKL8dqj81DnQ1
iMx7q+bMcKhJz6HT9iJNsH1u9rFuwlw5K+FqNlrlxazSUmDpnbqUbwcem33ciicl
jdBQQrCCyNMI0piWNS+2VwG8D3UZYOLsgHWSONK5oBDwNwDo5P8rQ3USOh4Gv6in
puKL0HsteTvycMPGoAj2ZQCs+dL6r5nogIsBMAtJ7n+Vw+hstGnbc7TdxDbWikDC
63KekXpeTyrYSBwK+mxzhs6p3lkydZxEQoh/iuKm4Pi6DFZRSZB+GTvFWSz+0Ek5
hLgqEI42LWRKx34qioO37C7cbY5ONo/O/G7wiPp3wjCm07YBFDV4awKP6XEnEfQ=
=4v2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 14:44 Shrink-wrapping: Introduction Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] Disallow predicating the prologue Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-31 13:20 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-01 18:59 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-01 21:08 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] Unique return rtx Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-31 13:23 ` Jeff Law
2011-05-03 11:54 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] Allow jumps in epilogues Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 16:46 ` Richard Henderson
2011-03-23 16:49 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 17:19 ` Richard Henderson
2011-03-23 17:24 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 17:27 ` Richard Henderson
2011-03-24 10:30 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-25 17:51 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-26 5:33 ` Richard Henderson
2011-03-31 20:09 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-31 21:51 ` Richard Henderson
2011-03-31 22:36 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-31 23:57 ` Richard Henderson
2011-04-05 21:59 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-11 17:10 ` Richard Henderson
2011-04-13 14:16 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-13 15:14 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-13 15:16 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-13 15:17 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-13 15:28 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-13 14:44 ` Richard Henderson
2011-04-13 14:54 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-04-15 16:29 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 14:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] Shrink-wrapping Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-07 14:51 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-07-07 15:40 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-07 17:00 ` Paul Koning
2011-07-07 17:02 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2011-07-07 17:05 ` Paul Koning
2011-07-07 17:08 ` Jeff Law
2011-07-07 17:30 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-08 22:59 ` [pdp11] Emit prologue as rtl Richard Henderson
2011-07-09 13:46 ` Paul Koning
2011-07-09 16:53 ` Richard Henderson
2011-07-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] Shrink-wrapping Richard Earnshaw
2011-07-07 20:19 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-07-08 8:30 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-07-08 13:57 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-11 11:24 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-07-11 11:42 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-21 3:57 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-21 11:25 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-07-28 11:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-28 12:45 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-07-28 23:30 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-07-29 12:40 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-03 10:42 ` Alan Modra
2011-08-03 11:19 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-02 8:40 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-03 15:39 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-08-24 19:23 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-24 20:48 ` Richard Sandiford
2011-08-24 20:55 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-26 14:49 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-08-26 14:58 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-08-26 15:06 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-08-28 10:58 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-07 21:41 ` Michael Hope
2011-03-23 14:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] Generate more shrink-wrapping opportunities Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 15:03 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-23 15:05 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 15:18 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 13:26 ` Jeff Law
2011-03-31 13:34 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-03-23 14:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] A testcase Bernd Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E15E61C.7010007@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=paul_koning@dell.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).