From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6758 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2011 08:18:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 6666 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2011 08:18:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.96) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:18:42 +0000 Received: from omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HkJ91g0020cQ2SLA9kJgg7; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:18:40 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.9] ([24.4.193.8]) by omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HkJf1g0010BKwT48WkJfWl; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:18:40 +0000 References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8F190) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <4E164B7A-D67D-494B-A32C-151750483412@comcast.net> Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Nathan Froyd , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , "java-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:18:00 -0000 To: Nathan Froyd X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2 On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > This patch series does something similar to what I am curious what the speed differences are.