From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29834 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2011 00:25:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 29824 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2011 00:25:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CF,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:24:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p680OP7W022986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 20:24:25 -0400 Received: from anchor.twiddle.net (vpn-224-243.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.224.243]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p680OOk7030789; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 20:24:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4E164E38.9030206@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:32:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Schmidt CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH 0/6] Move dwarf2 cfi creation to a new pass References: <1309723308-26667-1-git-send-email-rth@redhat.com> <4E14EC99.40607@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4E14EC99.40607@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00578.txt.bz2 On 07/06/2011 04:15 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Ok for the bits that aren't from me anyway, once you're satisfied it's > sufficiently tested. I committed this series. I tested x86_64, ia64, and ppc64-linux; Iain tested i686-darwin9; and you tested arm-linux. Excluding vax, that covered all the targets that required changes before this series went in. Hopefully I'll have another series soon that includes your change to cfg-like propagation. r~