From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11882 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2011 22:24:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 11867 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2011 22:24:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:24:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7NMO9Qn025311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:24:09 -0400 Received: from [10.11.11.26] (vpn-11-26.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.11.26]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7NMO8I1009656; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:24:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4E542888.5040907@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew MacLeod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Henderson CC: gcc-patches Subject: Re: [cxx-mem-model] Atomic C++ header file changes References: <4E4BE0BE.8000901@redhat.com> <4E4D9349.30702@redhat.com> <4E5425EC.1040906@redhat.com> <4E542790.2040301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E542790.2040301@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg01958.txt.bz2 On 08/23/2011 06:20 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 08/23/2011 03:13 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >> ! DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_2 (BT_FN_I1_CONST_VPTR_INT, BT_I1, BT_CONST_VOLATILE_PTR, >> ! BT_INT) > Given that VPTR means "volatile PTR", I suggest you use CVPTR instead of CONST_VPTR. > Hmm, well the reason I spelled it out is because const was spelled out *everywhere* else... ie: DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_2 (BT_FN_INT_CONST_STRING_PTR_CONST_STRING, BT_INT, BT_CONST_STRING, BT_PTR_CONST_STRING) Andrew